ARCHIVED – Summative Evaluation of the Metropolis Project Phase II: Knowledge Transfer Activities and Impacts

Archived information

Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

May 2009


Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Management Response

1. Introduction

2. Evaluation Methodology

3. KT and the Knowledge System Conceptual Framework

4. Findings

  • 4.1 KT processes involving Metropolis researchers and federal research users
    • 4.1.1 What are the Centre processes for soliciting research priorities from federal partners & what are the federal partner processes for conveying their research needs to Centres?
    • 4.1.2 What processes are used by Centres to convey federal funding partners’ research priorities to researchers?
    • 4.1.3 Are Federal funding partners’ satisfied with the processes?
    • 4.1.4 Are federal funding partners satisfied with the outcomes?
    • 4.1.5 Knowledge Brokering – building and sustaining collaborations between researchers and research users
    • 4.1.6 Do federal funding partners access and use research products for policy making?
    • 4.1.7 Do federal funding partners support access to, and use of, research products for policy making?
  • 4.2 Policy maker satisfaction with Metropolis research products & outputs
    • 4.2.1 Is Metropolis producing research products that are relevant to government policy makers?
    • 4.2.2 Have the Metropolis Centres conducted macro (incl. pan-Canadian), comparative and longitudinal studies to support policy development?
  • 4.3 Impact of Metropolis Research on Policy Making

5. Conclusions

Appendix A: Evaluation Matrix

Appendix B: List of documents reviewed

Appendix C: List of interviewees

Appendix D: Federal funding partners interview guide

Appendix E: Knowledge broker functions / roles

Appendix F: Distribution of findings based on familiarity with the Metropolis Project

Appendix G: Policy Priorities for Metropolis Phase II

Acknowledgement
This report was prepared with the assistance of Government Consulting Services and Dr. Harley Dickinson, University of Saskatchewan

Date Modified: