Evaluation of the Nationally Standardized Data Collection Strategy on Hate-Motivated Crime

Appendix A: Evaluation matrix for the Nationally Standardized Data Collection Strategy on Hate-Motivated Crime

Evaluation Issues / Questions Indicators Methodologies
Interviews Doc Review Survey of Police Services Admin Data
CIC/Multi Program Reps CCIS Program Reps Sample of Other Stakeholders (Int’l, Comm Groups, Academics, OGDs) POLISFootnote 33
1.0 Relevance
1.1 Is there a continued need for a nationally standardized data collection strategy on hate-motivated crime? 1.1.1 Prevalence of hate-motivated crime in Canada over time.     x x x    
1.1.2 Perceptions of program stakeholders with respect to continued information needs. x x x x   x  
1.1.3 Number of report downloads.             x
1.2 Does the initiative continue to be consistent with departmental and government-wide priorities? 1.2.1 Degree of alignment with departmental strategic outcomes/priorities (Multiculturalism/CIC). x       x    
1.2.2 Degree of alignment with Government of Canada priorities. x x x   x    
1.3 Is the program consistent with federal roles and responsibilities? 1.3.1 Alignment with legislative and federal obligations. x       x    
2.0 Performance
2.1 Were federal partners and stakeholders successfully engaged in the development and implementation of CAPAR? 2.1.1 Perception of police services and stakeholders with respect to the utility and necessity of hate crime data collection. x x x x   x  
2.1.2 Number of training sessions and presentations provided.             x
2.2 Do police services have the training and tools necessary to identify and collect standardized hate-motivated crime data? 2.2.1 Extent of training provided to police services.             x
2.2.2 Extent of training tools, training materials, and on-site assistance available to police services.             x
2.2.3 Police services’ perceptions regarding training and tools.       x   x x
2.3 Is Statistics Canada collecting high-quality, nationally standardized hate-motivated crime data? 2.3.1 Proportion of Canadian police services reporting on hate-motivated crime data.             x
2.3.2 Nature and extent of data quality verification.   x          
2.3.3 Reasons why police services are not reporting hate-motivated crime data.   x   x   x  
2.4 To what extent is nationally standardized hate-motivated crime data made available? 2.4.1 Type and extent of information dissemination (conferences, statistical tables and analytical reports, website, etc.). x x x x     x
2.4.2 Stakeholder perceptions of data availability.     x x   x  
2.5 Do stakeholders have an understanding of the nature and extent of hate-motivated crime provided by Statistics Canada? 2.5.1 Type and extent of information dissemination (conferences, pdf downloads from website, etc.).             x
2.5.2 Stakeholder perceptions.     x x   x  
2.6 Have stakeholders applied their knowledge of hate-motivated crime to improve programs, policies and services? 2.6.1 Number and examples of changes to programs/policies/ services reported by stakeholders. x x x x x x  
3.0 Alternatives
3.1 Is Statistics Canada the most suitable delivery mechanism for the data strategy? 3.1.1 Evidence of alternatives for collection of hate-motivated crime in Canada. x x x x x x  
3.1.2 Evidence that Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics is meeting reporting and delivery requirements. x       x    
3.1.3 Cost of current approach.         x   x
3.1.4 Perception of stakeholders regarding alternative approaches, including cost implications (implementation of strategy by RCMP, police services, provinces). x x x x   x  

Page details

Date modified: