Evaluation of the Nationally Standardized Data Collection Strategy on Hate-Motivated Crime
Appendix A: Evaluation matrix for the Nationally Standardized Data Collection Strategy on Hate-Motivated Crime
| Evaluation Issues / Questions | Indicators | Methodologies | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interviews | Doc Review | Survey of Police Services | Admin Data | |||||
| CIC/Multi Program Reps | CCIS Program Reps | Sample of Other Stakeholders (Int’l, Comm Groups, Academics, OGDs) | POLIS [note 33] |
|||||
| 1.0 Relevance | ||||||||
| 1.1 Is there a continued need for a nationally standardized data collection strategy on hate-motivated crime? | 1.1.1 Prevalence of hate-motivated crime in Canada over time. | x | x | x | ||||
| 1.1.2 Perceptions of program stakeholders with respect to continued information needs. | x | x | x | x | x | |||
| 1.1.3 Number of report downloads. | x | |||||||
| 1.2 Does the initiative continue to be consistent with departmental and government-wide priorities? | 1.2.1 Degree of alignment with departmental strategic outcomes/priorities (Multiculturalism/CIC). | x | x | |||||
| 1.2.2 Degree of alignment with Government of Canada priorities. | x | x | x | x | ||||
| 1.3 Is the program consistent with federal roles and responsibilities? | 1.3.1 Alignment with legislative and federal obligations. | x | x | |||||
| 2.0 Performance | ||||||||
| 2.1 Were federal partners and stakeholders successfully engaged in the development and implementation of CAPAR? | 2.1.1 Perception of police services and stakeholders with respect to the utility and necessity of hate crime data collection. | x | x | x | x | x | ||
| 2.1.2 Number of training sessions and presentations provided. | x | |||||||
| 2.2 Do police services have the training and tools necessary to identify and collect standardized hate-motivated crime data? | 2.2.1 Extent of training provided to police services. | x | ||||||
| 2.2.2 Extent of training tools, training materials, and on-site assistance available to police services. | x | |||||||
| 2.2.3 Police services’ perceptions regarding training and tools. | x | x | x | |||||
| 2.3 Is Statistics Canada collecting high-quality, nationally standardized hate-motivated crime data? | 2.3.1 Proportion of Canadian police services reporting on hate-motivated crime data. | x | ||||||
| 2.3.2 Nature and extent of data quality verification. | x | |||||||
| 2.3.3 Reasons why police services are not reporting hate-motivated crime data. | x | x | x | |||||
| 2.4 To what extent is nationally standardized hate-motivated crime data made available? | 2.4.1 Type and extent of information dissemination (conferences, statistical tables and analytical reports, website, etc.). | x | x | x | x | x | ||
| 2.4.2 Stakeholder perceptions of data availability. | x | x | x | |||||
| 2.5 Do stakeholders have an understanding of the nature and extent of hate-motivated crime provided by Statistics Canada? | 2.5.1 Type and extent of information dissemination (conferences, pdf downloads from website, etc.). | x | ||||||
| 2.5.2 Stakeholder perceptions. | x | x | x | |||||
| 2.6 Have stakeholders applied their knowledge of hate-motivated crime to improve programs, policies and services? | 2.6.1 Number and examples of changes to programs/policies/ services reported by stakeholders. | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| 3.0 Alternatives | ||||||||
| 3.1 Is Statistics Canada the most suitable delivery mechanism for the data strategy? | 3.1.1 Evidence of alternatives for collection of hate-motivated crime in Canada. | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| 3.1.2 Evidence that Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics is meeting reporting and delivery requirements. | x | x | ||||||
| 3.1.3 Cost of current approach. | x | x | ||||||
| 3.1.4 Perception of stakeholders regarding alternative approaches, including cost implications (implementation of strategy by RCMP, police services, provinces). | x | x | x | x | x | |||
- Date Modified:
