Evaluation of HOST

Appendix D: List of Evaluation Issues and Questions

Evaluation Issues Evaluation Questions
Program Rationale –
To what extent does the program remain relevant to the priorities of the GoC and to the needs of newcomers
  1. Is there a continuing need for federal government programming to provide the services offered?
  2. Are newcomers adequately prepared for the settlement, adaptation and integration experience prior to coming to Canada?
  3. Are the priorities and criteria for the programs appropriate for the range of clients served? Are there other services that would assist the integration of newcomers that are not included?
  4. Are the services offered complementary with other settlement/resettlement programs (e.g. ISAP or Host, LINC and RAP) and with the components of these programs that are managed by provincial governments?
Program Delivery –
Are the design and
delivery of the program appropriate?
  1. Are program objectives and the roles and responsibilities of CIC (HQs, regional offices, local offices) and the SPOs, including reporting responsibilities, clearly defined and understood?
  2. Does the application process result in the most appropriate service providers being funded to deliver settlement services?
  3. To what extent have settlement programs been successfully promoted to newcomers and other stakeholders? Which mechanisms have been most effective?
  4. Are potential clients able to access settlement services in a timely fashion?
  5. To what extent is the program capable of serving newcomers in both official languages?
  6. To what extent do service providers have adequate tools and support for delivery of settlement services (Host)?
  7. To what extent do SPOs have the capacity to deliver effective services to newcomers?
  8. Is there an appropriate balance between consistency in delivery of services across CIC jurisdictions and flexibility to accommodate changing needs and regional priorities?
  9. Are there adequate financial controls in place to monitor program delivery?
  10. To what extent does CIC monitor, evaluate, report and use information on results, share best practices and use information to contribute to program improvements?
  11. To what extent do service providers collect and report program data? Do they have adequate tools and support to do this?
Issue: Effectiveness and Efficiency – To what extent does the program use the most appropriate, efficient and cost-effective methods to meet its objectives?
  1. Is service delivery through external service provider organizations effective and efficient?
  2. What methods are used to assess client needs and are these effective?
  3. Are program funding allocations appropriate to meet the needs of the range of clients?
  4. Are there alternative approaches to service delivery?
Issue: Success – To what extent has the program(s) been successful in achieving its desired outcomes?
  1. Are clients satisfied with the settlement services they receive and do they meet their needs?
  2. To what extent does the promotion of the Host program contribute to the program’s desired immediate outcomes?
  3. To what extent does the recruitment and selection of volunteers contribute to the program’s desired immediate outcomes?
  4. To what extent does volunteer training contribute to the program’s desired immediate outcomes?
  5. To what extent does newcomer assessment contribute to the program’s desired immediate outcomes?
  6. To what extent does matching of volunteers and newcomers contribute to the program’s desired immediate outcomes?
  7. To what extent does support of volunteers and newcomers contribute to the program’s desired immediate outcomes?
  8. To what extent do Host services contribute to the program’s desired intermediate outcomes?

<< contents | previous |